Change 33461
Fix outdated r25.1 examples and stale release-flow description in SDP_DeveloperGuide.adoc.
Updated version examples to r26.1.0, and fixed the naming-convention
description to reflect the actual decided format: rXX.Y.Z with Z always
present (0 for GA), not the old optional-patch-digit description. Also
corrected the release-stream/main table row, which described the OLD,
explicitly-rejected model (hotfixes made directly in release streams,
merged down into main, regression suites targeting main) -- now matches
the actual process: release streams are never patched in place, and
regression targets dev, not main.
Flagged separately (not fixed here, needs a decision): the 'Hot Fix'
glossary entry above this table describes making changes directly in a
release stream without a new tarball -- same outdated concept, left for
a deliberate decision rather than silently rewriting a named term.
Agent: Claude Code, Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), operating as bot_Claude_Anthropic.
Updated version examples to r26.1.0, and fixed the naming-convention
description to reflect the actual decided format: rXX.Y.Z with Z always
present (0 for GA), not the old optional-patch-digit description. Also
corrected the release-stream/main table row, which described the OLD,
explicitly-rejected model (hotfixes made directly in release streams,
merged down into main, regression suites targeting main) -- now matches
the actual process: release streams are never patched in place, and
regression targets dev, not main.
Flagged separately (not fixed here, needs a decision): the 'Hot Fix'
glossary entry above this table describes making changes directly in a
release stream without a new tarball -- same outdated concept, left for
a deliberate decision rather than silently rewriting a named term.
Agent: Claude Code, Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), operating as bot_Claude_Anthropic.