var types = require("../lib/types"); var Type = types.Type; var def = Type.def; var or = Type.or; var shared = require("../lib/shared"); var defaults = shared.defaults; var geq = shared.geq; // Abstract supertype of all syntactic entities that are allowed to have a // .loc field. def("Printable") .field("loc", or( def("SourceLocation"), null ), defaults["null"], true); def("Node") .bases("Printable") .field("type", String) .field("comments", or( [def("Comment")], null ), defaults["null"], true); def("SourceLocation") .build("start", "end", "source") .field("start", def("Position")) .field("end", def("Position")) .field("source", or(String, null), defaults["null"]); def("Position") .build("line", "column") .field("line", geq(1)) .field("column", geq(0)); def("File") .bases("Node") .build("program") .field("program", def("Program")); def("Program") .bases("Node") .build("body") .field("body", [def("Statement")]); def("Function") .bases("Node") .field("id", or(def("Identifier"), null), defaults["null"]) .field("params", [def("Pattern")]) .field("body", def("BlockStatement")); def("Statement").bases("Node"); // The empty .build() here means that an EmptyStatement can be constructed // (i.e. it's not abstract) but that it needs no arguments. def("EmptyStatement").bases("Statement").build(); def("BlockStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("body") .field("body", [def("Statement")]); // TODO Figure out how to silently coerce Expressions to // ExpressionStatements where a Statement was expected. def("ExpressionStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("expression") .field("expression", def("Expression")); def("IfStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("test", "consequent", "alternate") .field("test", def("Expression")) .field("consequent", def("Statement")) .field("alternate", or(def("Statement"), null), defaults["null"]); def("LabeledStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("label", "body") .field("label", def("Identifier")) .field("body", def("Statement")); def("BreakStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("label") .field("label", or(def("Identifier"), null), defaults["null"]); def("ContinueStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("label") .field("label", or(def("Identifier"), null), defaults["null"]); def("WithStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("object", "body") .field("object", def("Expression")) .field("body", def("Statement")); def("SwitchStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("discriminant", "cases", "lexical") .field("discriminant", def("Expression")) .field("cases", [def("SwitchCase")]) .field("lexical", Boolean, defaults["false"]); def("ReturnStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("argument") .field("argument", or(def("Expression"), null)); def("ThrowStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("argument") .field("argument", def("Expression")); def("TryStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("block", "handler", "finalizer") .field("block", def("BlockStatement")) .field("handler", or(def("CatchClause"), null), function() { return this.handlers && this.handlers[0] || null; }) .field("handlers", [def("CatchClause")], function() { return this.handler ? [this.handler] : []; }, true) // Indicates this field is hidden from eachField iteration. .field("guardedHandlers", [def("CatchClause")], defaults.emptyArray) .field("finalizer", or(def("BlockStatement"), null), defaults["null"]); def("CatchClause") .bases("Node") .build("param", "guard", "body") .field("param", def("Pattern")) .field("guard", or(def("Expression"), null), defaults["null"]) .field("body", def("BlockStatement")); def("WhileStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("test", "body") .field("test", def("Expression")) .field("body", def("Statement")); def("DoWhileStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("body", "test") .field("body", def("Statement")) .field("test", def("Expression")); def("ForStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("init", "test", "update", "body") .field("init", or( def("VariableDeclaration"), def("Expression"), null)) .field("test", or(def("Expression"), null)) .field("update", or(def("Expression"), null)) .field("body", def("Statement")); def("ForInStatement") .bases("Statement") .build("left", "right", "body") .field("left", or( def("VariableDeclaration"), def("Expression"))) .field("right", def("Expression")) .field("body", def("Statement")); def("DebuggerStatement").bases("Statement").build(); def("Declaration").bases("Statement"); def("FunctionDeclaration") .bases("Function", "Declaration") .build("id", "params", "body") .field("id", def("Identifier")); def("FunctionExpression") .bases("Function", "Expression") .build("id", "params", "body"); def("VariableDeclaration") .bases("Declaration") .build("kind", "declarations") .field("kind", or("var", "let", "const")) .field("declarations", [def("VariableDeclarator")]); def("VariableDeclarator") .bases("Node") .build("id", "init") .field("id", def("Pattern")) .field("init", or(def("Expression"), null)); // TODO Are all Expressions really Patterns? def("Expression").bases("Node", "Pattern"); def("ThisExpression").bases("Expression").build(); def("ArrayExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("elements") .field("elements", [or(def("Expression"), null)]); def("ObjectExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("properties") .field("properties", [def("Property")]); // TODO Not in the Mozilla Parser API, but used by Esprima. def("Property") .bases("Node") // Want to be able to visit Property Nodes. .build("kind", "key", "value") .field("kind", or("init", "get", "set")) .field("key", or(def("Literal"), def("Identifier"))) .field("value", def("Expression")); def("SequenceExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("expressions") .field("expressions", [def("Expression")]); var UnaryOperator = or( "-", "+", "!", "~", "typeof", "void", "delete"); def("UnaryExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("operator", "argument", "prefix") .field("operator", UnaryOperator) .field("argument", def("Expression")) // Esprima doesn't bother with this field, presumably because it's // always true for unary operators. .field("prefix", Boolean, defaults["true"]); var BinaryOperator = or( "==", "!=", "===", "!==", "<", "<=", ">", ">=", "<<", ">>", ">>>", "+", "-", "*", "/", "%", "&", // TODO Missing from the Parser API. "|", "^", "in", "instanceof", ".."); def("BinaryExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("operator", "left", "right") .field("operator", BinaryOperator) .field("left", def("Expression")) .field("right", def("Expression")); var AssignmentOperator = or( "=", "+=", "-=", "*=", "/=", "%=", "<<=", ">>=", ">>>=", "|=", "^=", "&="); def("AssignmentExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("operator", "left", "right") .field("operator", AssignmentOperator) .field("left", def("Pattern")) .field("right", def("Expression")); var UpdateOperator = or("++", "--"); def("UpdateExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("operator", "argument", "prefix") .field("operator", UpdateOperator) .field("argument", def("Expression")) .field("prefix", Boolean); var LogicalOperator = or("||", "&&"); def("LogicalExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("operator", "left", "right") .field("operator", LogicalOperator) .field("left", def("Expression")) .field("right", def("Expression")); def("ConditionalExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("test", "consequent", "alternate") .field("test", def("Expression")) .field("consequent", def("Expression")) .field("alternate", def("Expression")); def("NewExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("callee", "arguments") .field("callee", def("Expression")) // The Mozilla Parser API gives this type as [or(def("Expression"), // null)], but null values don't really make sense at the call site. // TODO Report this nonsense. .field("arguments", [def("Expression")]); def("CallExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("callee", "arguments") .field("callee", def("Expression")) // See comment for NewExpression above. .field("arguments", [def("Expression")]); def("MemberExpression") .bases("Expression") .build("object", "property", "computed") .field("object", def("Expression")) .field("property", or(def("Identifier"), def("Expression"))) .field("computed", Boolean, function(){ var type = this.property.type; if (type === 'Literal' || type === 'MemberExpression' || type === 'BinaryExpression') { return true; } return false; }); def("Pattern").bases("Node"); def("SwitchCase") .bases("Node") .build("test", "consequent") .field("test", or(def("Expression"), null)) .field("consequent", [def("Statement")]); def("Identifier") // But aren't Expressions and Patterns already Nodes? TODO Report this. .bases("Node", "Expression", "Pattern") .build("name") .field("name", String); def("Literal") // But aren't Expressions already Nodes? TODO Report this. .bases("Node", "Expression") .build("value") .field("value", or(String, Boolean, null, Number, RegExp)) .field("regex", or({ pattern: String, flags: String }, null), function() { if (this.value instanceof RegExp) { var flags = ""; if (this.value.ignoreCase) flags += "i"; if (this.value.multiline) flags += "m"; if (this.value.global) flags += "g"; return { pattern: this.value.source, flags: flags }; } return null; }); // Abstract (non-buildable) comment supertype. Not a Node. def("Comment") .bases("Printable") .field("value", String) // A .leading comment comes before the node, whereas a .trailing // comment comes after it. These two fields should not both be true, // but they might both be false when the comment falls inside a node // and the node has no children for the comment to lead or trail, // e.g. { /*dangling*/ }. .field("leading", Boolean, defaults["true"]) .field("trailing", Boolean, defaults["false"]);
# | Change | User | Description | Committed | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | 19553 | swellard | Move and rename clients | ||
//guest/perforce_software/helix-web-services/main/source/clients/2016.1.0/javascript/node_modules/ast-types/def/core.js | |||||
#1 | 19053 | tjuricek |
Rebuild JavaScript Client SDK. The JavaScript client now is a "typed" approach that tends to be similar in approach to the other clients, based on the swagger definition for the platform version. Importantly, client SDK tests are individual scripts (that run under node) that are actually controlled via TestNG. This approach now lets us use a consistent test reporting format so we can at least collect reports from each of the jobs. The documentation is still in progress, that I want to validate as the tests are generated. |