= Server Deployment Package (SDP) for Perforce Helix: SDP Failover Guide (for Unix and Windows) Perforce Professional Services <email@example.com> :revnumber: v2019.3 :revdate: 2020-08-17 :doctype: book :icons: font :toc: :xrefstyle: full == Preface The Server Deployment Package (SDP) is the implementation of Perforce's recommendations for operating and managing a production Perforce Helix Core Version Control System. It is intended to provide the Helix Core administration team with tools to help: * High Availability (HA) * Disaster Recovery (DR) This guide is intended to provide instructions for failover in an SDP environment using built in Helix Core features. For more details see: * http://www.perforce.com/manuals/p4sag/Content/P4SAG/failover.html#Failover[Sysadmin Guide - Failover] *Please Give Us Feedback* Perforce welcomes feedback from our users. Please send any suggestions for improving this document or the SDP to firstname.lastname@example.org. :sectnums: == Overview We need to consider planned vs unplanned failover. Planned may be due to upgrading the core Operating System or some other dependency in your infrastructure, or a similar activity. Unplanned covers risks you are seeking to mitigate with failover: * loss of a machine, or some machine related hardware failure * loss of a VM cluster * failure of storage * loss of a data center or machine room * etc... See also https://www.perforce.com/manuals/cmdref/Content/CmdRef/p4_failover.html[p4 failover in Command Reference Guide] Please refer to the following sections: * <<SDP_Guide.Unix.adoc#_planning_for_ha_and_dr,SDP Guide: Planning for HA and DR>> * <<SDP_Guide.Unix.adoc#_pre_requisites_for_failover,SDP Guide: Pre-requisites for Failover>> === Planning HA failover should not require a P4PORT change for end users. Depending on your topology, you can avoid changing P4PORT by having users set P4PORT to an alias which can be easily changed centrally. For example: * `p4d-bos-01`, a master/commit-server in Boston, pointed to by a DNS name like `perforce` or `perforce.p4demo.com`. * `p4d-bos-02`, a standby replica in Boston, not pointed to by a DNS until failover, at which time it gets pointed to by `perforce`/`perforce.p4demo.com`. * Changing the Perforce broker configuration to target the backup machine. See <<SDP_Guide.Unix.adoc#_server_host_naming_conventions,SDP Guide: Server Host Naming Conventions>> Other advanced networking options might be possible if you talk to your local networking gurus (virtual IPs etc). == Planned Failover In this instance you can run `p4 failover` with the active participation of its upstream server. We are going to provide examples with the following assumptions: * ServerID `master_1` is current commit, running on machine `p4d-bos-01` * ServerID `p4d_ha_bos` is HA server * DNS alias `perforce` is set to `p4d-bos-01` === Prerequisites You need to ensure: . you are running p4d 2018.2 or later for your commit and all replica instances, preferably 2020.1 source /p4/common/bin/p4_vars 1 p4 info | grep version . your failover target server instance is of type `standby` or `forwarding-standby` + On HA machine: p4 info : ServerID: p4d_ha_bos Server services: standby Replica of: perforce:1999 : . it has Options mandatory set in its server spec p4 server -o p4d_ha_bos | grep Options Options: mandatory . you have a valid `license` installed in `/p4/1/root` (<instance> root) + On HA machine: cat /p4/1/license . Monitoring is enabled - so the following works: p4 monitor show -al . DNS changes are possible so that downstream replicas can seamlessly connect to HA server . Current `pull` status is valid p4 pull -lj === Failing over The basic actions are the same for Unix and Windows, but there are extra steps required as noted in <<_failing_over_on_windows>> . Run `p4 failover` in reporting mode on HA machine: p4 failover + Successful output looks like: Checking if failover might be possible ... Checking for archive file content not transferred ... Verifying content of recently update archive files ... After addressing any reported issues that might prevent failover, use --yes or -y to execute the failover. . Perform failover: p4 failover --yes + Output should be something like: Starting failover process ... Refusing new commands on server from which failover is occurring ... Giving commands already running time to complete ... Stalling commands on server from which failover is occurring ... Waiting for 'journalcopy' to complete its work ... Waiting for 'pull -L' to complete its work ... Waiting for 'pull -u' to complete its work ... Checking for archive file content not transferred ... Verifying content of recently updated archive files ... Stopping server from which failover is occurring ... Moving latest journalcopy'd journal into place as the active journal ... Updating configuration of the failed-over server ... Restarting this server ... + During this time, if you run commands against the master, you may see: Server currently in failover mode, try again after failover has completed . Change the DNS entries so downstream replicas (and users) will connect to the new master (that was previously HA) . Validate that your downstream replicas are communicating with your new master + On each replica machine: p4 pull -lj + Or against the new master: p4 servers -J + Check output of `p4 info`: : Server address: p4d-bos-02 : ServerID: master_1 Server services: commit-server : . Make sure the old server spec (`p4d_ha_bos`) has correctly had its `Options:` field set to `nomandatory` (otherwise all replication would stop!) === Failing over on Windows The basic steps are the same as for on Unix, but with some extra steps at the end. After the `p4 failover --yes` command has completed its work (on the HA server machine): . Review the settings for the Windows service (examples are for instance `1`) - note below *-S* is uppercase: p4 set -S p4_1 + Example results: C:\p4\1>p4 set -S p4_1 : P4JOURNAL=c:\p4\1\logs\journal (set -S) P4LOG=c:\p4\1\logs\p4d_ha_aws.log (set -S) P4NAME=p4d_ha_aws (set -S) P4PORT=1666 (set -S) P4ROOT=c:\p4\1\root (set -S) : . Change the value of `P4NAME` and `P4LOG` to correct value for `master`: p4 set -S p4_1 P4NAME=master p4 set -S p4_1 P4LOG=c:\p4\1\logs\master.log + And re-check the output of `p4 set -S p4_1` . Restart the service: c:\p4\common\bin\svcinst stop -n p4_1 c:\p4\common\bin\svcinst start -n p4_1 . Run `p4 configure show` to check that the output is as expected for the above values. == Unplanned Failover In this case there is no active participation of upstream server, so there is an increase risk of lost data. We assume we are still failing over to the HA machine, so: * Failover target is `standby` or `forwarding-standby` * Server spec still has `Options:` set to `mandatory` * Original master is not running The output of `p4 failover` on the DR machine might be: Checking if failover might be possible ... Server ID must be specified in the '-s' or --serverid' argument for a failover without the participation of the server from which failover is occurring. Checking for archive file content not transferred ... Verifying content of recently update archive files ... After addressing any reported issues that might prevent failover, use --yes or -y to execute the failover. . Execute `p4 failover` with the extra parameter to specify server we are failing over from: p4 failover --serverid master_1 --yes Expected output is somewhat shorter than for planned failover: Starting failover process ... Waiting for 'pull -L' to complete its work ... Checking for archive file content not transferred ... Verifying content of recently updated archive files ... Moving latest journalcopy'd journal into place as the active journal ... Updating configuration of the failed-over server ... Restarting this server ... === Unplanned Failover on Windows The extra steps required are basically the same as in <<_failing_over_on_windows>> == Old style failover This does not use the `p4 failover` command (so is valid for pre-2018.2 p4d versions) See: https://community.perforce.com/s/article/2495[KB - Failing over to a Replica]
Updated :revnumber: and :revdate: fields for *.adoc files
|#9||28099||robert_cowham||Updated Failover Guide to add a couple of post failover checks.|
Updated :revnumber: to 2021.1 for remaining docs for upcoming
SDP r21.1 release.
Refinements to @27712:
* Resolved one out-of-date file (verify_sdp.sh).
* Added missing adoc file for which HTML file had a change (WorkflowEnforcementTriggers.adoc).
* Updated revdate/revnumber in *.adoc files.
* Additional content updates in Server/Unix/p4/common/etc/cron.d/ReadMe.md.
* Bumped version numbers on scripts with Version= def'n.
* Generated HTML, PDF, and doc/gen files:
- Most HTML and all PDF are generated using Makefiles that call an AsciiDoc utility.
- HTML for Perl scripts is generated with pod2html.
- doc/gen/*.man.txt files are generated with .../tools/gen_script_man_pages.sh.
|#6||27709||robert_cowham||Note check for serverlocks. Fix typo in path in failover.|
Fix typo in tmpfs /etc/fstab entry which stopped it working in the doc.
Mention in pre-requisites for failover and failover guide the need to review
OS Config for your failover server.
Document Ubuntu 2020.04 LTS and CentOS/RHEL 8 support. Note performance
has been observed to be better with CentOS.
Document pull.sh and submit.sh in main SDP guide (remove from Unsupported doc).
Update comments in triggers to reflect that they are reference implementations, not just examples. No code change.
Update with some checklists for failover to ensure valid.
Update to v2020.1
Add Usage sections where missing to Unix guide
Refactor the content in Unix guide to avoid repetition and make things read more sensibly.
Add section on server host naming conventions
Clarify HA and DR, and update links across docs
Fix doc structure for Appendix numbering
New common Failover Guide - removed old one.
This is based on 'p4 failover' so requires 2018.2 or later.
First draft of new Failover Guide using "p4 failover"
Linked from SDP Unix Guide